Intellectual property 101

June 9, 2007

Sigh. From over on SLOG, where they used one of my photos in violation of it’s creative commons license:

“Purple Mark is a nice guy, and I’m sure brunch is lovely. However, that has nothing to do with the use of the photo here. I don’t care where you snagged it from, you have a responsibility to track down the copyright before posting it.

You do not have permission from the photographer to use this photo in this way. I know, because I am the photographer.

Luckily for you, it’s not a full copyright, but licensed under a generous Creative Commons license. I take thousands of photos for FREE USE by anyone who wants to use them for any noncommercial purpose, as long as the photographer is credited and a link back to the source is provided. In addition to the rules of the license, I am very flexible and easy to work with when people ASK PERMISSON to use things for commercial purposes. In these cases however, I generally don’t allow photos of people or the work of artists without the permission of those people or artists.

See this link for the full text of the license on this photo:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.en-us

I know you’re just a guest, so I asked nicely first. Do me the favor of playing by the rules, or I will ask SLOG to remove the photo.

I repeat: properly credit the photo, and this will suffice as the link back to the source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lifeasart/169499957/ which ALSO links to the CC license, clear as day. Please give other photographers the same courtesy in the future - because while this one instance isn’t really that big a deal, in the information age intellectual property and data exchange is very important.”

context:
http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/gay_pride_in_tel_aviv_has_low_turnout

I’m too tired to take on CC stuff, I wasted all my moral energy on the whole female commodification thing in the 90s as a dj and see where refusing to play all-girl parties and shake my ass on the internet got me. Anyway, I tried. I feel bad because I let Seattlest and the PI slide earlier this week on linking back properly because they at least credited, but I had to say something. I’m sure eventually I’ll tire of this too, and someone younger and smarter can take the world on.

  1. Tamara commented

    on June 9, 2007 2:29 pm

    I mean to say something like “data exchange ethics”, but whatever. Man I wish I had the resources to study and enforce this stuff. Psh - I just wish I had the resources for a camera bigger than a pack of cigarettes.

  2. Tamara commented

    on June 9, 2007 4:11 pm

    Next class: The Model Release.
    http://www.danheller.com/model-release.html#8.3
    Wow…

    While we’re here, another favorite of mine, the photographer’s rights:
    http://wiki.photoblogs.org/wiki/Photographer’s_Rights
    See also “10 big myths about copyrights”

    Another discussion about CC:
    http://www.flickr.com/groups/central/discuss/72157594330501973/
    (one person’s solution was to just change them all back to All Rights Reserved)

  3. Tamara commented

    on June 10, 2007 11:46 am

    Wow people are mean.

  4. Tamara commented

    on June 11, 2007 7:35 am

    They ended up just removing the picture, which was totally not the point, and one jerk walks off into the sunset, remaining clueless. How pointless.

    Oh well - one way in which he didn’t win: I was ten seconds away from yanking ALL my photos and making them so that you couldn’t download them, and Josh convinced me to take a walk in the sun, instead. I of course changed my mind, because that isn’t the point either. And then I spent the evening making something special that can’t exist on the web, and I feel better.

    Thanks for the inspiration.

  5. Ch. commented

    on June 11, 2007 8:46 am

    I don’t know if you’ve considered this, but there are a fair number of softwares out there that will let you add watermarks to batches of photos; perhaps not ideal and in keeping with the spirit of the CC licence, but it is an option. However, if this is the first time it’s happened it’s probably not worth losing sleep over - you’ve uploaded a lot of photos.

  6. Tamara commented

    on June 12, 2007 10:49 am

    I’ll definitely do that for my own artwork, should I ever put it online. Also, artists and people who wish to limit distribution of images of themselves and their work can email me, I am willing to/capable of making it impossible to download copies. So let me know, okay?

    Here are more (Great!) pictures of Purple Mark, with credit and links to info on the photographers via flickr:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/purplemark/

Leave a comment

Name: (required)

Mail: (required)

Website: